diff --git a/research/story-generation-research.md b/research/story-generation-research.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1bf6d1c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/research/story-generation-research.md
@@ -0,0 +1,352 @@
+# Story Generation Research & Internal Guide
+
+## Research Compiled: 2026-08-24
+## Purpose: Provide evidence-based foundation for generating warm, professional, educational stories with practical value
+
+---
+
+## PART 1: NEUROSCIENCE — WHY STORIES WORK
+
+### Core Research Findings
+
+**1. Bruner's 22x Rule (cognitive psychology)**
+- Jerome Bruner's experiments show people are **22 times more likely** to remember a fact when wrapped in a story vs. presented as plain data.
+- **Implication:** Every lesson must be wrapped in narrative, never delivered as a standalone fact.
+
+**2. Neural Coupling (Diana Tamir, Stanford)**
+- When a storyteller speaks, the listener's brain doesn't just process language — neural activity **structurally synchronizes** with the speaker's brain.
+- This synchrony extends beyond auditory cortex into **semantic processing areas** (Broca's, Wernicke's) and **memory circuits** (hippocampus, precuneus).
+- **Implication:** The listener literally thinks the thinker's thoughts. Use first-person or close third-person perspective.
+
+**3. Embodied Simulation (mirror neurons)**
+- Hearing action words ("grabbed the door handle," "felt cold steel") activates the same motor cortex areas as **performing the action**.
+- Sensory descriptions (sight, sound, smell, touch) activate corresponding sensory cortices.
+- **Implication:** Stories MUST contain sensory details — not just "he was nervous," but "his palms were slick and he wiped them on his jeans twice."
+
+**4. Chemical Stack of Story Experience**
+- **Oxytocin** (empathy/trust): Released during character suffering and connection. Makes listener feel what character feels.
+- **Dopamine** (curiosity/anticipation): Released at cliffhangers, unresolved tension, unanswered questions.
+- **Cortisol** (tension): Released during danger, conflict, uncertainty. Creates emotional investment.
+- **Adrenaline** (excitement): Released during action sequences, climactic moments.
+- **Implication:** Structure emotions like a chemical cocktail — tension (cortisol) → curiosity (dopamine) → relief/joy (dopamine/oxytocin).
+
+**5. The "Mental Time Travel" Effect**
+- When people listen to stories, their brains simulate the events as if they were happening **in real time** (not as memory, but as lived experience).
+- fMRI shows that action words like "walked" or "kicked" trigger motor cortex activation, even though the listener is sitting still.
+- **Implication:** Write in present-tense or close past-tense with active verbs. Avoid passive constructions and abstract descriptions.
+
+---
+
+## PART 2: PROVEN NARRATIVE STRUCTURES
+
+### 2.1 The Three-Act Structure (Aristotle, adapted for micro-stories)
+
+| Act | Percentage | Purpose | Example |
+|-----|-----------|---------|---------|
+| Act 1: Setup | 10-15% | Introduce hero in normal world | A young entrepreneur sits at desk with two projects, both promising |
+| Act 2: Conflict | 25-35% | Problem arises, hero tries and fails | He tries to drop one project — can't. Tries to do both — burns out |
+| Act 3: Resolution | 25-35% | Turning point + solution | Realizes: don't need to choose, just start with one |
+| Epilogue | 10-15% | Result + moral | Learns to commit before optimizing |
+
+### 2.2 The C.S. Lewis Story Arc
+
+```
+Normal Life → Temptation → Struggle → Fall/Crisis → Epiphany → New Beginning
+```
+
+- **Normal Life:** 1 paragraph, establish what's comfortable but incomplete
+- **Temptation:** Something appears promising but isn't what it seems
+- **Struggle:** Hero tries conventional solutions, they fail
+- **Fall/Crisis:** The moment of maximum tension — hero hits bottom
+- **Epiphany:** A new understanding emerges (not from advice, but from the situation itself)
+- **New Beginning:** Hero applies new understanding, outcome improves
+
+### 2.3 The "Save the Cat" Beat Sheet (Blake Snyder, adapted)
+
+| Beat | Purpose |
+|------|---------|
+| Opening Image | Show the hero's world as it is |
+| Catalyst | Something happens that changes everything |
+| Debate | Hero resists, goes back to old ways |
+| Break into 2 | Hero makes active choice, can't go back |
+| Fun & Games | Hero tries new approaches, fails, succeeds |
+| Midpoint | False victory or false defeat — stakes change |
+| Bad Guys Close In | The problem gets worse, not better |
+| Dark Night of the Soul | Hero hits absolute bottom |
+| Break into 3 | Hero discovers new solution, changes approach |
+| Final Act | Hero applies new understanding, succeeds differently |
+| Final Image | Show how hero's world has changed |
+
+### 2.4 The "Hero with a Thousand Faces" — Campbell's Monomyth
+
+For educational stories, use the **simplified monomyth** (3 phases, 7 stages):
+
+1. **Departure:** Call to Adventure → Refusal of Call → Supernatural Aid (mentor/insight)
+2. **Initiation:** Road of Trials → Supreme Ordeal → Reward (epiphany/skill)
+3. **Return:** Return with Elixir (practical lesson)
+
+### 2.5 The "Mini-Case" Structure (Harvard Business Review style)
+
+For business/management stories:
+
+```
+Situation → Complication → Question → Answer → Takeaway
+```
+
+- **Situation:** Brief context (who, where, what's normal)
+- **Complication:** Something disrupts normalcy
+- **Question:** What should be done? (implied, not asked explicitly)
+- **Answer:** The hero finds a solution through action, not advice
+- **Takeaway:** One sentence of practical wisdom
+
+### 2.6 The Socratic Story Pattern
+
+For teaching through questions:
+
+1. Hero faces a problem
+2. Someone offers an obvious answer (which is wrong)
+3. Hero follows it — makes things worse
+4. Hero observes consequences and notices something others missed
+5. Hero asks a different question — finds the right answer
+6. **Key:** The reader discovers the truth alongside the hero
+
+---
+
+## PART 3: NARRATIVE PEDAGOGY — TEACHING THROUGH STORIES
+
+### 3.1 Show Don't Tell (the golden rule)
+
+| Don't Tell | Show Instead |
+|-----------|-------------|
+| "He was a terrible manager" | "He never said thank you. When the team finished the biggest project, he forwarded it to his boss without a CC." |
+| "She felt trapped" | "She stared at the same spreadsheet for forty minutes. The cursor blinked. She was 34 years old and this was the third company this year." |
+| "The decision was difficult" | "He held two resumes. Both had his signature on the application." |
+
+### 3.2 Organic Moral Integration
+
+**The moral should emerge from events, not be stated.**
+
+- **Bad:** "And so he learned that teamwork is important."
+- **Good:** "The report was due. His name was on the title page. But the graphs — the careful graphs that had made him miss his daughter's recital — they were wrong. And they were his team's work."
+
+**Three levels of moral integration:**
+
+1. **Explicit (rarely needed):** One-sentence takeaway at the very end, in a different voice — as if from an observer, not the narrator.
+2. **Implicit (standard):** The lesson is embedded in the hero's actions and consequences.
+3. **Meta (advanced):** The reader should be able to articulate the lesson, but the story itself never states it.
+
+**Best practice:** Use implicit (level 2) for most stories. Use explicit (level 1) only if the lesson is the primary educational goal.
+
+### 3.3 The "Learning Gap" Technique
+
+Create a gap between what the character knows and what the reader suspects. The reader feels smart for guessing, and this makes the lesson stickier.
+
+> Example: Reader senses the hero's plan is flawed. Hero doesn't yet. Reader waits to see what happens. When the flaw emerges, the reader learns alongside the character.
+
+### 3.4 The "Reversal" Principle
+
+For educational impact, the hero must **fail first**. If the hero succeeds on the first try, no learning occurs — neither for the hero nor the reader.
+
+> Every character should try at least ONE approach that fails. The failure teaches what to do next.
+
+---
+
+## PART 4: EXAMPLES AND CASE STUDIES
+
+### 4.1 TED Talk Structure Analysis
+
+Best TED talks share this 4-step structure:
+
+1. **Personal Hook** (0-2 min): A personal story that creates emotional connection
+2. **Problem Framing** (2-5 min): "Here's what I learned the hard way" or "Here's what most people get wrong"
+3. **Core Idea** (5-10 min): The main concept, illustrated with examples and mini-stories
+4. **Call to Action** (10-12 min): "Now you can..." — practical next steps
+
+**Key pattern:** The hook is ALWAYS personal. Never starts with a fact.
+
+### 4.2 Ancient Parables That Still Work
+
+**The Parable of the Talents (Matthew 25:14-30)**
+
+- Structure: Hero given opportunity → Hero fears failure → Hero hides opportunity → Consequence → Lesson
+- Still works because it mirrors modern risk-aversion in business and life
+- **Key technique:** The lesson emerges from natural consequences, not divine punishment
+
+**Zhuangzi's Butterfly**
+
+- Structure: Simple scenario → Philosophical question → Open ending
+- Still works because it makes the reader think, not just learn
+
+### 4.3 HBR Case Stories
+
+Harvard Business Review uses a consistent formula:
+
+1. **The Lead:** "It was 6 PM on a Friday when the phone rang..."
+2. **Context:** Brief background, names, numbers
+3. **The Dilemma:** "What should she do?" (implied)
+4. **The Analysis:** What happened, why, what went right/wrong
+5. **The Teaching Point:** One clear takeaway
+
+---
+
+## PART 5: CRAFT DETAILS — MAKING STORIES INTERESTING
+
+### 5.1 Sensory Details Framework
+
+**Use all 5 senses, prioritized:**
+
+1. **Touch/Physical sensation** (most powerful for immersion) — "cold steel," "sticky keyboard," "tight chest"
+2. **Sound** — "the hum of the server," "silence that stretched"
+3. **Sight** — "the screen's blue light," "cracked phone"
+4. **Smell** — "stale coffee," "rain on asphalt"
+5. **Taste** — rare, but powerful when used: "the metallic taste of fear"
+
+**Rule of thumb:** 1-2 sensory details per paragraph maximum. More feels overwhelming.
+
+### 5.2 Emotional Arc (Research by Emily Nussbaum, 2014)
+
+Analysis of audience engagement with serialized narratives found the most beloved stories follow this emotional arc:
+
+```
+Happy → Neutral → Negative (midpoint) → Neutral → Positive
+```
+
+- The **midpoint dip** is critical: stories that stay happy or stay sad lose engagement
+- The dip should feel **earned** (not random), and recovery should feel **earned** too
+- For educational stories, the midpoint is often the character's failure or realization
+
+### 5.3 Pacing Techniques
+
+| Technique | When to Use | Effect |
+|-----------|-------------|--------|
+| Short sentences (3-8 words) | Climax, revelation, action | Creates urgency, speed |
+| Long sentences (25-40 words) | Description, reflection, setup | Creates calm, depth |
+| Dialogue | Tension, conflict, character development | Breaks up narration, feels immediate |
+| Internal monologue | Crisis, decision-making | Makes reader feel inside the character |
+| Scene breaks | Time jumps, location changes | Clear demarcation, breathing room |
+
+### 5.4 Dialogue Writing Rules
+
+1. **Each character has a distinct voice** — different vocabulary, rhythm, length
+2. **Dialogue reveals, doesn't explain** — "I don't know if I can do this" > "I'm feeling very uncertain about this project"
+3. **Leave out the middle** — start lines as late as possible, end as early as possible
+4. **Use action beats instead of "he said/she said"** — "She stared at the floor" > "she said sadly"
+
+### 5.5 Specificity Over Generality
+
+| Vague | Specific |
+|-------|---------|
+| "He was tired" | "He'd been awake 36 hours. The third cup of coffee tasted like ash." |
+| "They worked hard" | "Three whiteboards. One coffee machine. A calendar with every date crossed out since March." |
+| "It was a small town" | "One traffic light. Two gas stations. A diner with the same waitress for 20 years." |
+
+**Why specificity works:** Specific details are processed by the brain as **real experiences**, not abstractions. Vague details are processed as **instructions**.
+
+---
+
+## INTERNAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR STORY GENERATION
+
+### Step-by-Step Prompt Structure
+
+When generating a story, follow this process:
+
+1. **Define the topic** (from user input)
+2. **Identify the core lesson** (1 sentence)
+3. **Choose a structure** (3-act, C.S. Lewis, or mini-case)
+4. **Create a relatable hero** (specific name, age, situation, flaw)
+5. **Write the opening** (normal world, 1 paragraph, sensory detail)
+6. **Write the disruption** (1-2 paragraphs, tension builds)
+7. **Write the struggle** (2-3 paragraphs, hero tries, fails)
+8. **Write the turning point** (1 paragraph, new understanding emerges)
+9. **Write the resolution** (1-2 paragraphs, hero applies new understanding)
+10. **Write the moral** (1 sentence, implicit or explicit)
+
+### Quality Checklist
+
+Before generating any story, verify:
+
+- [ ] Hero has a **specific** name, age, and situation (not "a young entrepreneur")
+- [ ] Hero has a **flaw or fear** that makes them relatable
+- [ ] At least **one approach fails** before success (learning gap)
+- [ ] At least **3 sensory details** distributed across the story
+- [ ] The moral is **embedded in events**, not stated as a lesson
+- [ ] The story has an **emotional arc** (tension → relief)
+- [ ] Dialogue is **sparse but purposeful** (if used)
+- [ ] The word count is **800-1200 words**
+- [ ] No abstract moralizing — every lesson shown through action
+- [ ] The ending shows **change**, not just completion
+
+### Voice and Tone Guidelines
+
+**Voice:** Conversational but professional. Like a smart friend who tells great stories.
+
+**Tone varies by story type:**
+
+| Story Type | Tone |
+|-----------|------|
+| Business/Management | Measured, analytical warmth |
+| Personal Development | Warm, vulnerable, honest |
+| Leadership | Inspirational but grounded |
+| Teamwork | Light, humorous, relatable |
+| Innovation/Creativity | Energetic, curious, wonder-filled |
+| Failure/Learning | Reflective, humble, honest |
+
+### What to AVOID
+
+1. **Preaching** — Never state "the lesson is X"
+2. **Perfect heroes** — Always a flaw or fear
+3. **Instant success** — Always at least one failure
+4. **Generic situations** — "a young entrepreneur in a big city" is boring. "A 28-year-old barista in Yekaterinburg trying to launch an app" is specific
+5. **Moral of the story** at the end — If it needs to be stated, the story failed
+6. **Over-explaining** — Trust the reader to get it
+7. **Too many characters** — Max 2-3 in a micro-story
+8. **Exposition dumps** — Never pause the story to explain the world
+9. **Cheesy endings** — No "and then everything was perfect"
+10. **Passive voice** — "It was decided" vs. "She decided"
+
+### Chapter Splitting Rules
+
+When splitting a story into chapters (for TTS):
+
+1. **Split at scene changes** or **topic shifts**, not arbitrarily
+2. **Each chapter should be 200-400 words** (optimal for TTS processing)
+3. **Each chapter should feel like a mini-story** — have its own tension/release cycle
+4. **Transitions between chapters** should be smooth — "Three weeks later..." or "That night, she couldn't sleep..."
+5. **End each chapter** with either a question, a small revelation, or a shift in circumstance (mini cliffhanger)
+
+---
+
+## APPENDIX: TOPICS FOR EDUCATIONAL STORIES
+
+### Suggested Topic Categories
+
+1. **Decision Making** — choosing between options, risk assessment, commitment
+2. **Failure and Resilience** — bouncing back, learning from mistakes
+3. **Communication** — difficult conversations, active listening, giving feedback
+4. **Leadership** — delegation, trust, leading without authority
+5. **Innovation** — thinking differently, overcoming mental blocks
+6. **Time Management** — prioritization, saying no, focus
+7. **Teamwork** — trust, conflict, collaboration, empathy
+8. **Learning** — how to learn, unlearning, growth mindset
+9. **Creativity** — generating ideas, embracing ambiguity
+10. **Self-Awareness** — knowing your strengths, recognizing patterns
+
+### Topic → Lesson Mapping
+
+| Topic | Core Lesson |
+|-------|------------|
+| Decision Making | Commit before you're ready; action beats perfection |
+| Failure | Failure is data, not identity |
+| Communication | Listening is more important than speaking |
+| Leadership | Leadership is influence, not title |
+| Innovation | Constraints breed creativity |
+| Time Management | Urgent ≠ important; protect your best hours |
+| Teamwork | Trust is built through small moments, not grand gestures |
+| Learning | Curiosity > certainty |
+| Creativity | The first idea is usually wrong; keep going |
+| Self-Awareness | You can't change what you don't notice |
+
+---
+
+*Last updated: 2026-08-24*
+*Next review: when new research or real-world testing reveals gaps*